Join 1,850+ professionals and transform your B2B sales results. Learn to sell the way big companies buy. Get insights delivered every Sunday - read in minutes, use forever.
Share
Read The Room
Published about 12 hours ago • 3 min read
Issue #128
Time for a coffee break or detailed numbers?
Read The Room
Buyers Don’t Think Like You Think They Think
Enterprise selling looks rational from the outside. There are decks, forecasts, financial models, decision gates and very serious people nodding at spreadsheets.
It feels like a world run by logic, but that's only half the story.
Attention rises and falls. People switch between careful evaluation and mental shortcuts depending on risk, fatigue, politics and exposure.
If you miss that shift, you explain when they want reassurance and reassure when they want proof.
And that is how perfectly good deals start wobbling.
Use my model and you won't be this model
Two Ways To Look At Everything
There are two processing modes at work in every enterprise deal narrative.
In “Active” mode, buyers weigh evidence, test assumptions, compare alternatives and examine downside risk.
This takes effort. It shows up when the decision is personally relevant and consequences are real.
In “Passive” mode, buyers conserve energy and rely on shortcuts like brand, precedent and internal policy.
What feels safe to defend in a steering committee when someone asks, “Why did you choose them?” This is how corporate professionals survive.
Enterprise Deals Are Always Moving
A sponsor might spend thirty minutes dissecting revenue impact, then open the next session with, “Who else in our sector uses you?”
Procurement may interrogate cost drivers and then retreat into, “This is not our standard template.” Same person, different cognitive state. No personality disorder required, but being procurement they probably have a few anyway.
The mistake sellers make is assuming deep evaluation is always switched on.
It is not.
Sometimes you are presenting Shakespeare to someone who just wants a road sign.
It's not Shakespeare here , is it?
Practical Judgement
You need a way to diagnose the mode in real time. Here are the signs to look out for:
Ownership - Is someone clearly accountable for the outcome?
Consequence - Is there measurable upside or downside tied to the decision?
Specificity - Are questions detailed and pointed, or broad and procedural?
Once you know this it becomes second nature
Active Mode
Clear ownership, real consequence and sharp questioning signal evaluation mode.
In that state, bring structure, quantify impact and show trade-offs. Surface risks and mitigation properly and actively invite challenge.
Passive Mode
Diffuse ownership, abstract impact and policy language signal shortcut mode. In that state, reduce complexity and anchor to precedent.
Emphasise alignment with norms to make the decision feel defensible. Think less courtroom, more “this is how these deals usually work”.
Sequence Your Case
Early conversations are usually about safety. Establish credibility, category clarity and fit first.
Only when someone’s name is attached to the outcome, do you introduce commercial modelling and scenario analysis.
During negotiation, expect oscillation because people revert to shortcuts under pressure. Reinforce normality and precedent while guarding the numbers you agreed during evaluation periods.
If you ignore sequencing, you will either overwhelm or underwhelm. Both are surprisingly easy and can be devastating to your timeline.
Time to start again, Ben
Simple Test
In any meeting, pause and ask yourself:
Who owns the outcome?
What happens if this goes wrong?
How mentally available are they right now?
If ownership is vague, consequence unclear and energy low, simplify, reframe, reassure. Do not roll out another slide with a complicated waterfall chart that IT swears is basic.
If ownership is explicit, consequences measurable and questions specific, slow down. Show your workings and walk through assumptions. Treat it like a proper commercial discussion.
Learn to read the room
Manage Silence
Silence can mean thinking, but It can also mean disengagement.
If you respond to every quiet moment with more explanation, you come across as nervous.
Instead, test depth with a focused question that requires effort to answer, then listen:
Specific responses mean evaluation is active.
Generalities mean restore safety, reduce complexity.
Mistake to Avoid
Do not treat every stakeholder the same, processing mode is a function of exposure, not job title.
The operations lead examines delivery risk, finance looks at capital allocation, marketing at reputational exposure. The executive sponsor examines strategic alignment.
All of them will care about career risk, that much is true.
Yes, we all think everyone else is the problem
Tailor depth and framing to what each person stands to gain or lose. One universal pitch is lazy and won’t work.
Never equate volume with proof, more slides do not signal authority. Brevity, specificity and clarity are the true indicators of competence and respect.
Direction
Understanding these two modes will change how you show up. You’ll stop flooding meetings with analysis when buyers need reassurance. You’ll stop offering surface comfort when buyers want rigour.
You read the room, adjust your intention, and reduce friction seamlessly.
Enterprise selling rewards judgement over enthusiasm. Recognise the right mode and match your message.
Let the customer’s cognitive state dictate your behaviour instead of your slide deck.
If you loved this then let me know and tell a friend who doesn't work for the competition - they'll definitely buy you lunch in return.
Once you win, here's a guide to getting the maximum value from the customer, click here.
Join 1,850+ professionals and transform your B2B sales results. Learn to sell the way big companies buy. Get insights delivered every Sunday - read in minutes, use forever.
Issue #127 A fair deal is not an equal deal, ask Daffy here... Asymmetry Is Money in Enterprise Deals There is inherent imbalance in the value of deals for small companies selling to large enterprises. This can be a source of huge competitive advantage for you, or a danger to avoid. Enterprise buyers rarely struggle to understand what you sell. They nod and agree, they say it makes sense. Then the deal drags, procurement turns up, and price becomes the only thing anyone wants to talk about....
Issue #126 "The numbers look great, can it microwave a sausage roll?" How to Weaponise AI in Real Deals Enterprise deals can be like being trapped in a political drama written by a bored toddler. There’s always a finance bloke asking if the numbers are realistic, an ops director whose team is at capacity, and a head of IT auditioning to be a Bond villain. And that’s before procurement shows up with a 37 chapter RFP and an attitude problem. Customer Stakeholders Arrive For The Presentation You...
Issue #125 Humans are no more independent of their environment than a pot plant Relationships Are Part of Product Market Fit All reps are different and fitting the right one to the right customer can make or break a customer relationship. I had two great salesmen in my team: Simon and Mikhail. Every month, both of them were top of the numbers. No dramas or excuses, just consistent results. But something kept happening that didn’t show up on the leaderboard. The rest of the team seemed to like...